Aniridic scleral fixation of intraocular lens: The answer to vision loss with photophobia!

Background: Aniridia is defined as missing iris tissue which can be partial, subtotal, or total. Characteristic clinical symptoms include photophobia and decreased visual acuity due to an increased light perception. In addition to this, disturbing cosmetic problems are prevalent. Even after implantation of an intraocular lens, patients often tend to be unsatisfied. Purpose: The answer to this problem lies in the implantation of an aniridic scleral fixation of intraocular lens (SFIOL), which has a central optical axis that acts as the refractive lens and a peripheral rim of a hyperpigmented area that mimics the iris and hence reduces photophobia. The purpose of the video was to demonstrate the use of black diaphragm intraocular lens (BDIOL) implantation, its surgical steps, and its outcomes. Synopsis: We report one such case where a young patient presented with post-traumatic aniridia with subluxated total cataract and spillover vitreous hemorrhage. He was subjected to a vitrectomy, cataract removal, and placement of an aniridic SFIOL with prolene 9-0 using the four-point fixation method. This gave an extremely gratifying outcome and solved both problems, that is, vision and photophobia. Highlight: Before implantation of the SFIOL, the patients had reduced visual acuity from aphakia and intolerable glare from aniridia. In this case-based approach and with relevant example, we tried to provide a solution for tricky scenarios like co-existing traumatic cataract and traumatic aniridia. The patient showed improved visual acuity and marked glare reduction after black diaphragm SFIOL implantation. Video link: https://youtu.be/atl60WetFsM.

Late onset corneal decompensation following retained lens fragment in anterior chamber years after uneventful phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE: To report a case of late onset corneal decompensation following cataract surgery due to retained lens fragment in anterior chamber. OBSERVATIONS: A 65 year old female presented with complaint of gradual dimness of vision in left eye since 4 months. She underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation elsewhere 4 years back. On examination, the CDVA in left eye was 20/200. Slit-lamp examination revealed corneal edema with Descemet's folds. She was diagnosed as pseudophakic bullous keratopathy and was being treated with topical steroids, cycloplegics and hyperosmolar agents for the same. She was also counseled about a lamellar corneal transplant. Posterior segment examination was within normal limits. Since the position of the IOL (sulcus versus bag) was not clearly seen ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) imaging was performed to try and better understand the possible cause for corneal decompensation. To our surprise, on both, UBM and ASOCT, a single, retained lens fragment was noted at 6 0'clock in the anterior chamber. AC wash was performed to remove the retained lens fragment. 3 months post AC wash corneal edema resolved completely with improvement in the BCVA to 20/40. CONCLUSION: AND IMPORTANCE: This case highlights the importance of a thorough clinical evaluation supplemented with imaging modalities in order to make a complete diagnosis and eventually achieve better outcomes for the patient. In any case of unexplained corneal edema, either in the early or late postoperative period, UBM and ASOCT can become very helpful to determine the underlying cause.

Utility of a smartphone assisted direct ophthalmoscope camera for a general practitioner in screening of diabetic retinopathy at a primary health care center.

PURPOSE: To assess the use of smartphone-based direct ophthalmoscope photography for screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in known diabetic patients walking into a general practitioner's clinic and referring them to a vitreoretinal specialist for further evaluation and management if required. METHODOS: The study included 94 eyes of 47 walk-in patients in a general practitioner's OPD who were known to have type 2 diabetes mellitus and were already on treatment for the same. RESULTS: The study included 47 patients with diabetes with a mean age of 56.2 ± 9.4 years. The Cohen's kappa values revealed that the diagnosis related to the DR status made using a camera was in substantial agreement with the clinical diagnosis (Kappa value: 0.770). The Cohen's kappa values revealed that the diagnosis related to the DME made using a camera was in moderate agreement with the clinical diagnosis (Kappa value: 0.410). The agreement between the findings of the camera and clinical diagnosis was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Direct ophthalmoscope-based smartphone imaging can be a useful tool in the OPD of a general practitioner. These images can be assessed for retinopathy, and patients can be referred to a vitreoretinal specialist for further evaluation and management if needed. Hence, the burden of vision loss due to complications of DR in the rural sector can be abridged.

Incidence of presumed steroid response in contralateral eye of patients who underwent glaucoma filtration surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report the incidence of presumed steroid response in contralateral eye of patients who underwent glaucoma filtration surgery. METHODS: We reviewed records of 298 glaucoma patients (147 PACG [primary angle-closure glaucoma], 129 POAG [primary open-angle glaucoma], and 22 JOAG [juvenile open-angle glaucoma]) who underwent either trabeculectomy alone or trabeculectomy with cataract extraction. All patients received prednisolone acetate 1% eye drop postoperatively in the operated eye for up to 6 to 8 weeks. The contralateral eye received the same antiglaucoma medications as before. Information collected included age, sex, number of antiglaucoma medications in the fellow eye preoperatively, and VFI (visual field index). The preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) in the contralateral eye was taken as the baseline. The maximum IOP recorded postoperatively up to a follow-up period of 6 to 8 weeks was noted. A steroid response was defined as rise in the IOP by ≥6 mmHg. RESULTS: In this study, 298 eyes of 298 glaucoma patients were included. The mean age of patients was 60.1 ± 13.7 years. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications in the fellow eye pre-operatively was 2.4 ± 1.2. Mean preoperative and postoperative IOP in the fellow eye were 17.46 ± 7 and 19.37 ± 7.1 mmHg, respectively. Sixty-three eyes out of 298 eyes (21.14%) showed a rise in IOP by 6 mmHg. The maximum IOP difference noted was 15 mmHg. The average time interval to the defined steroid response was 16.13 days. The majority showed a steroid response within 19 days. CONCLUSION: Steroid response is a significant factor leading to elevated IOP postoperatively in the contralateral eye as well.